star trek, metal gear solid and more disease
bah. I'm getting sick again. it has not been two weeks since I finally kicked out last cold from my body but now it seems to be on the move again. I have a pain in the joints, head and feel generally unwell. well, it will pass.
just saw the first real trailer for Star Trek XI (which I will call it whatever JJ Abrams would like to honk at me). it was a mixed experience. I really liked that Abrams takes up the massacre which Kirk survives as a boy, and even the design of the enterprise, but then ... well, I do not really know. Zachary "Sylar" Quinto as Spock sounded like a good choice in advance but after seeing some clips of his role interpretation I do not know what to think. and lo and behold, the former so sexlösa Star Trek universe show up hot sex scenes. do not misunderstand me now, sex is always a pleasure to both watch and participate in, but in Star Trek? Likewise, this film will tear up all continuity of series and films have struggled to hold together in a little over 40 years. boring.
'm out of metal gear solid IV yesterday and although it was a mixed experience. I really liked the first game, liked the runner up some more and completely adore the third. Fourth, felt in many ways much more like a interactive movie with game elements than a game with interactive movie moments. and I know, I know that all the fanboys screaming on the internet forums out loud sky that metal gear always been that way. Sure, the previous games have been full of long cut scenes that brought the action forward, but they have been primarily game and nothing else. I think I clocked a sequence between the fourth game for a little over 45 minutes. it is not acceptable, how well organized they are. the game then? Yes, it is more of the same exciting stealth, hide and seek game that made the series famous. but why not more games and less films?
0 comments:
Post a Comment